Verdict: I would pay $80 for this, but not $349. And I would gladly make them work in a mix if I had to. But that has to do with my personal preference more than anything else. I was wondering if anyone of you has tried the Console Emulations by various plugin companies like Waves - NLS Sonimus - Satson / Britson Slate - VCC Brainworx - BX Console E,G,N AirWidnows - Console5 Presonus Studio One - Console summing technique plugins (I dont remember how it is called) etc.
#Bx console ssl 4000 e vs waves ssl 4000 series
I never liked the G series in either the Waves or UAD, so I didn’t bother demoing the Brainworx SSL G.
This isn’t a big deal on one or two channels, but when these things are strung across every channel on your mix, its pretty annoying. To fully exploit the non-linearities, the thing will hiss at you like a rabid snake when you hit the stop button on your DAW or in sections of a song where the music dies down or in gaps between sections in the arrangement. The Brainworx SSL also requires a noise gate be placed after the unit if a compression chain follows. I don’t want to be locked into this for 3 years because upgrades/updates are not included.
#Bx console ssl 4000 e vs waves ssl 4000 pro
free vocal presets for logic pro x, fl studio, ableton, pro tools, studio one, and garageband using stock plugins learn the foundations of a professional mixing chain and try out a recording template designed to help you achieve industry standards in seconds with the click of a button. $29 pr month for 29 months then own it free-and-clear at the end of the 29 months is a good deal, the problem is that you can’t just pay the $850 up front. Studio one 4 mixing template bx console ssl 4000 e. One thing I thought about was assembling a pick 10 package at Brainworx which would have dropped the price on the SSL E, SSL G, and Neve Console N strip to $80 each. I would place it slightly higher than the Waves in my personal preference, but I’m not sure that $349 price of the Brainworx gives someone on a more limited budget a real clear cut value of almost 9x the price over the Waves version. I like the Brainworx SSL better than Slate, but I don’t like it as much as UAD. This is one thing that I think Waves got right way back when they did the first SSL E and G strips a long time back. When picking an SSL emulator, to me it comes down to saturation and non-linearities. The curve in the hi shelves are shaped differently, the gates have a vastly different feel, and the fixed attack in the dynamics section is distinct.
Not that one console can’t do the other, but Neves always seem like they excel at mixes that favor extreme clarity over punch and power. To me Neve is about pristine crystal clear “Hi-Fidelity” (as Skywalker says). I almost never re-counstruct a virtual mixer (meaning a bunch of channel strips in a DAW) using SSL’s for classical, cinematic, orchestral, or folk tracks. So when in real life, when a label pays big $$$$ to sit me down behind a real SSL, it almost always for pop country and for rock projects.